Natural Supplements Versus Pharmaceutical Drugs

One would expect a pharmaceutical medicine to have some credibility once it has been the subject of extensive research (including double-blind studies), which can take years and cost millions of dollars. But what if there was a fundamental problem with the system that caused resources to be diverted from finding a cure or, even better, preventing the disease to treating its symptoms? What if, instead of just being defective, the system frequently caused the patient to be in a worse health condition even after they finished taking their medication? Given our extensive understanding of the human body and its sensitivity to synthetic substances, why do we, as patients, readily accept the idea that we should be treated with these drugs? In the process of alleviating one symptom, we end up with two or three additional ones, a new chronic illness to manage, and, of course, another prescription to fill every month.
No matter how many people report feeling healthier after incorporating holistic practices into their routines, no one practicing holistic medicine can ever assert that their methods can cure, prevent, or treat disease. These kinds of assertions can only be made by pharmaceutical industry. Those words actually belong to them. That right's deservingness is beside the point. But it's important to remember that the majority of all-natural vitamins have been through generations of testing.
Natural Cellular Defence is a patented liquid detoxifying product manufactured using zeolite technology, offered by Waiora. I recently become a distributor of this product due to my interest in discovering a holistic approach to cancer treatment. The fact that it is completely natural led to its eventual introduction to the market as a supplement, yet it had its origins in cancer drug development. Medical research has shown that Natural Cellular Defence can activate the p21 tumour suppressor gene in cancer cells and safely eliminate heavy metals and toxic pollutants. Plus, it's totally safe for kids of all ages and doesn't contain any harmful substances. On its own, this all-natural health supplement has the potential to reduce the buildup of waste and toxins in the typical person's body, which contributes to a wide range of chronic conditions. However, we do not make any promises regarding the number of people who will benefit from taking this natural supplement. There is no medicine in it.
I would prefer to see non-toxic approaches given more credence and attention rather than the extreme and damaging ways used to treat tumours in cancer patients, which have irritated me for a long time. A disproportionate amount of resources are devoted to disease detection rather than prevention. Avoidance, not response, is paramount. When a disease is detected, it has already had an opportunity to cause symptoms and spread. The very least we should not do after making a diagnosis is to inject a patient with harmful medications.
Chemotherapy has the following side effects: low haemoglobin, low white blood cells, low platelets, infection, pain, nausea, vomiting, hair loss, skin injury, heart damage, lung damage, liver damage, kidney damage, loss of hearing, small stature, hormonal problems (low growth hormone, low thyroid hormone, infertility, second cancer, intellectual decline, worsening of neurological symptoms, ineffectiveness, and death).
Take this study from Canada's McGill Cancer Centre, one of the world's biggest and most renowned cancer treatment facilities, as an example of the hypocrisy inherent in cancer therapy. The researchers wanted to know how physicians would react if they were given a cancer diagnosis. In response to the anonymous survey, 58 out of 64 physicians stated that they or their loved ones did not approve of any chemotherapy programs. Most people feel the medications are too harmful and don't work, therefore they've decided against using them. In order to reduce the size of their patients' tumours, do you think these same doctors would suggest chemotherapy? Sure enough, they are, and that's the way it should be if they want to be considered conventional. You, the cancer patient, are responsible for seeking out alternate, non-toxic treatments for your disease.
Naturally, you can come across a natural remedy that you're interested in trying, only to find that conventional medicine is preventing you from following through with your treatment plan. I read a very tragic story a few years back. It concerns a two-year-old boy named Alexander who has medulloblastoma, the most prevalent tumour in children's brains. Following Alexander's two brain surgeries, his parents gave serious attention to their son's treatment options and ultimately settled on a non-toxic medication that has a strong track record of success in combating brain cancer. The parents' oncologists warned them that the cancer would return if they did not get their hands on this cutting-edge medication, but the FDA said no. In December 1998, Alexander finished the third month of chemotherapy. He passed away on January 31, 1999. He had only recently turned 2.5 years old.
You know, four years ago, the physicians' proposed cutting-edge chemotherapy regimen had already failed to alleviate symptoms of paediatric brain tumours. Children of Alexander's age who had the same brain tumour as him had a similar outcome after receiving the identical chemotherapy medications that were given to him in 1998. Obviously, the parents had no idea that this treatment had failed. Remember that the doctors were getting ready to seize control via court order even as Alexander's parents were hesitating to bring him in for chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the parents were compelled to adopt a toxic treatment that was neither effective nor non-toxic, even though the parents preferred a non-toxic alternative.
It is my deepest fear that the medical establishment may have inflicted double harm on these parents. Vaccines administered during that era frequently contained thimerosal, a chemical linked to a wide range of neurological disorders in children, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and brain tumours.
The narrative of Alexander can be found at http://www.ouralexander.org/index.htm.
How serious is the risk of chemotherapy?
The website of the University of Iowa contains the following excerpt. Because it is a serious state of contamination, their methodology for dealing with "chemo spills" creates pictures of a pretty horrific scenario of contamination. This is how it is said:
Continuous infusions of chemotherapy produce waste, and both patients and carers need to know how to properly handle and dispose of this trash.
In the event that chemotherapy leaks or spills, the following protocols must be quickly put into place:
1. Wear a pair of one-time-use latex gloves.
2. Quickly remove any contaminated garments and wash the affected area with soap and water. Pay attention to any signs of redness, blistering, or burning. To report the spill, contact your nurse. If you need more instructions, she will provide them to you.
3. Get rid of anything sharp by putting it in a designated receptacle or a lidded container, such a coffee can.
4. Paper towels or another absorbent disposable material can be used to soak up spills.
5. Soap and water or a home cleaner like 409, alcohol, bleach, or liquid carpet cleaner can be used to disinfect the spill location.
6. Mark a trash can or a plastic bag as a chemotherapeutic waste container and place the absorbent material and gloves inside. The pharmacy staff will collect it at a later time.
7. The clothes or linens of a patient or carer who has been spilt should be cleaned in hot water separately from their regular laundry.
8. Wearing appropriate occupational safety gloves, scrub the affected area with soap and water and rinse it off if the spill happens on exposed furniture.
9. For at least 48 hours following therapy, patients and carers should be instructed to wash their hands thoroughly and exercise caution when handling the patient's vomitus or other excretions.
Think about the "spill" they're talking about: the poisons that a cancer patient will undoubtedly consume.
I don't want to cast aspersions on the medical field altogether; after all, there are many competent doctors and times when medication is essential. Nevertheless, you should exercise caution when heeding recommendations that might have an impact on your health. Sometimes the medical system can be taking us in the wrong direction, and that's something we need to think about. Natural remedies can't promise a cure or treatment for illness, but sometimes you have to step back, do your research, and draw your own conclusions.
Paula Rothstein's copyright is from 2006.
Oh my goodness!
The Politics of Cancer Survival: Natural Supplements Versus Pharmaceutical Drugs
Paula Rothstein is the author.
This sentence is sourced from an online article about health.
The save date was 2007-07-25 at 12:30:12.
subject: medical
article:

One would expect a pharmaceutical medicine to have some credibility once it has been the subject of extensive research (including double-blind studies), which can take years and cost millions of dollars. But what if there was a fundamental problem with the system that caused resources to be diverted from finding a cure or, even better, preventing the disease to treating its symptoms? What if, instead of just being defective, the system frequently caused the patient to be in a worse health condition even after they finished taking their medication? Given our extensive understanding of the human body and its sensitivity to synthetic substances, why do we, as patients, readily accept the idea that we should be treated with these drugs? In the process of alleviating one symptom, we end up with two or three additional ones, a new chronic illness to manage, and, of course, another prescription to fill every month.
No matter how many people report feeling healthier after incorporating holistic practices into their routines, no one practicing holistic medicine can ever assert that their methods can cure, prevent, or treat disease. These kinds of assertions can only be made by pharmaceutical industry. Those words actually belong to them. That right's deservingness is beside the point. But it's important to remember that the majority of all-natural vitamins have been through generations of testing.

Natural Cellular Defence is a patented liquid detoxifying product manufactured using zeolite technology, offered by Waiora. I recently become a distributor of this product due to my interest in discovering a holistic approach to cancer treatment. The fact that it is completely natural led to its eventual introduction to the market as a supplement, yet it had its origins in cancer drug development. Medical research has shown that Natural Cellular Defence can activate the p21 tumour suppressor gene in cancer cells and safely eliminate heavy metals and toxic pollutants. Plus, it's totally safe for kids of all ages and doesn't contain any harmful substances. On its own, this all-natural health supplement has the potential to reduce the buildup of waste and toxins in the typical person's body, which contributes to a wide range of chronic conditions. However, we do not make any promises regarding the number of people who will benefit from taking this natural supplement. There is no medicine in it.
I would prefer to see non-toxic approaches given more credence and attention rather than the extreme and damaging ways used to treat tumours in cancer patients, which have irritated me for a long time. A disproportionate amount of resources are devoted to disease detection rather than prevention. Avoidance, not response, is paramount. When a disease is detected, it has already had an opportunity to cause symptoms and spread. The very least we should not do after making a diagnosis is to inject a patient with harmful medications.
Chemotherapy has the following side effects: low haemoglobin, low white blood cells, low platelets, infection, pain, nausea, vomiting, hair loss, skin injury, heart damage, lung damage, liver damage, kidney damage, loss of hearing, small stature, hormonal problems (low growth hormone, low thyroid hormone, infertility, second cancer, intellectual decline, worsening of neurological symptoms, ineffectiveness, and death).
Take this study from Canada's McGill Cancer Centre, one of the world's biggest and most renowned cancer treatment facilities, as an example of the hypocrisy inherent in cancer therapy. The researchers wanted to know how physicians would react if they were given a cancer diagnosis. In response to the anonymous survey, 58 out of 64 physicians stated that they or their loved ones did not approve of any chemotherapy programs. Most people feel the medications are too harmful and don't work, therefore they've decided against using them. In order to reduce the size of their patients' tumours, do you think these same doctors would suggest chemotherapy? Sure enough, they are, and that's the way it should be if they want to be considered conventional. You, the cancer patient, are responsible for seeking out alternate, non-toxic treatments for your disease.
Naturally, you can come across a natural remedy that you're interested in trying, only to find that conventional medicine is preventing you from following through with your treatment plan. I read a very tragic story a few years back. It concerns a two-year-old boy named Alexander who has medulloblastoma, the most prevalent tumour in children's brains. Following Alexander's two brain surgeries, his parents gave serious attention to their son's treatment options and ultimately settled on a non-toxic medication that has a strong track record of success in combating brain cancer. The parents' oncologists warned them that the cancer would return if they did not get their hands on this cutting-edge medication, but the FDA said no. In December 1998, Alexander finished the third month of chemotherapy. He passed away on January 31, 1999. He had only recently turned 2.5 years old.
You know, four years ago, the physicians' proposed cutting-edge chemotherapy regimen had already failed to alleviate symptoms of paediatric brain tumours. Children of Alexander's age who had the same brain tumour as him had a similar outcome after receiving the identical chemotherapy medications that were given to him in 1998. Obviously, the parents had no idea that this treatment had failed. Remember that the doctors were getting ready to seize control via court order even as Alexander's parents were hesitating to bring him in for chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the parents were compelled to adopt a toxic treatment that was neither effective nor non-toxic, even though the parents preferred a non-toxic alternative.
It is my deepest fear that the medical establishment may have inflicted double harm on these parents. Vaccines administered during that era frequently contained thimerosal, a chemical linked to a wide range of neurological disorders in children, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and brain tumours.
The narrative of Alexander can be found at http://www.ouralexander.org/index.htm.
How serious is the risk of chemotherapy?
The website of the University of Iowa contains the following excerpt. Because it is a serious state of contamination, their methodology for dealing with "chemo spills" creates pictures of a pretty horrific scenario of contamination. This is how it is said:
Continuous infusions of chemotherapy produce waste, and both patients and carers need to know how to properly handle and dispose of this trash.
In the event that chemotherapy leaks or spills, the following protocols must be quickly put into place:
1. Wear a pair of one-time-use latex gloves.
2. Quickly remove any contaminated garments and wash the affected area with soap and water. Pay attention to any signs of redness, blistering, or burning. To report the spill, contact your nurse. If you need more instructions, she will provide them to you.
3. Get rid of anything sharp by putting it in a designated receptacle or a lidded container, such a coffee can.
4. Paper towels or another absorbent disposable material can be used to soak up spills.
5. Soap and water or a home cleaner like 409, alcohol, bleach, or liquid carpet cleaner can be used to disinfect the spill location.
6. Mark a trash can or a plastic bag as a chemotherapeutic waste container and place the absorbent material and gloves inside. The pharmacy staff will collect it at a later time.
7. The clothes or linens of a patient or carer who has been spilt should be cleaned in hot water separately from their regular laundry.
8. Wearing appropriate occupational safety gloves, scrub the affected area with soap and water and rinse it off if the spill happens on exposed furniture.
9. For at least 48 hours following therapy, patients and carers should be instructed to wash their hands thoroughly and exercise caution when handling the patient's vomitus or other excretions.
Think about the "spill" they're talking about: the poisons that a cancer patient will undoubtedly consume.
I don't want to cast aspersions on the medical field altogether; after all, there are many competent doctors and times when medication is essential. Nevertheless, you should exercise caution when heeding recommendations that might have an impact on your health. Sometimes the medical system can be taking us in the wrong direction, and that's something we need to think about. Natural remedies can't promise a cure or treatment for illness, but sometimes you have to step back, do your research, and draw your own conclusions.
Oh my goodness!

Location:

Share :